MINI-CHOLECYSTECTOMY: A FEASIBLE OPTION
Abstract
Background: In standard or conventional cholecystectomy gallbladder is approach through asubcostal incision of 7-10 Cm. New technique and procedures have evolved, aiming at decreased
tissue damage, pain, hospital stay and complications. This study was conducted to assess
cholecystectomy through 5 Cm mini-laparotomy. Methods: This study was conducted at
Department of General Surgery, Ward-26, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi from
January, 2008 to January, 2009. Both sexes irrespective of age were included in this study. Ninety
cases were females and 10 were male. Mean age of the patients was 48 years. Minicholecystectomy was performed on patients and results evaluated as percent and frequency.
Results: This study included 100 patients with cholelithiasis. Mini-cholecystectomy was possible
in 95% cases, and in 5 cases incision had to be extended to conventional cholecystectomy. The
average operating time was 50 minutes and postoperative hospital stay was 2-days and
postoperative complications like minor biliary leak, haemorrhage and wound infection was seen in
10 cases. Conclusion: Mini-cholecystectomy is a safe procedure with shorter operative time,
fewer complications, better prognosis, and less of postoperative hospital stay. It may be
recommended as a procedure of choice where laparoscopic facilities are not available.
Keywords: Gallbladder, Cholelithiasis, Mini-cholecystectomy, Mini-laparotomy
References
Gilliland TM, Traverso LW. Modern standard of comparison
of cholecystectomy with alternative treatment of
symptomatic cholelithiasis with emphasis on long term relief
of symptoms. Surg Gynacol Obstect 1990;170:39-40.
Traverso LW. Clinical manifestation and impact of gall-stone
diseases. Am J Surg 1993;165:405-8.
Langenbuch C, Ein fall von Extirpation der Gall blasé wagen
chronischer. Berlinerklin Wochenschr 1882;19:725-7.
Garcia-valdecasas JC, Almenara R, Cabrer C, de Lacy AM,
Sust M, Taurá P, et al. Subcostal incision versus midline
laparotomy in gall stone surgery: a prospective randomized
trial. Br J Surg 1988;75:473-5.
Dubois F, Berthelot G, Levard H. Cholecystectomy par
coellospie (Cholecystectomy by coelioscopy). Presse Med
;18:980-2.
O'Dowyer PJ, Murphy JJ, O'Huggins NJ, Cholecystectomy
through 5 cm subcostal incision. Br J Surg 1990:77;1189-90.
Ledet WP Jr. ambulatory cholecystectomy without disabilityArch Surg 1990:125;1434-5.
Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, KO ST,
Airan M. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectom; a
national survey of 4,292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604
cases. Am J Surg 1993;165:9-14.
Ros A, Gustafsson L, Krook H, Nordgren CE, Thorell A,
Wallen G, Nilsson E. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus
mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy A prospective,
randomized, single-blind study. Ann Surg 2001;234:741-9.
Sharma AK, Rangan HK, Choubey RP. Mini-lap
cholecystectomy: a viable alternative to laparoscopic
cholecystectomy for the third world? Aust NZ J Surg
;68:774-7.
Tate JJ, Lau WY, Leung K L, LI AK. Laparoscopic versus
mini-incision cholecystectomy. Lancet 1993:341:1214-5.
Rozos I, Frenczy J, Schmitz R. Micro and minicholecystectomies in the 21st century. Orv Hetil
;144:1291-7.
Ahmad A, Khan HM, Gulshan S, Shah TA. Mini
cholecystectomy: A comparison with laparoscopic
cholecystectomy: Ann King Edward Med Uni 2005;11:387-8.
Seale AK, Ledet JR. Minicholecystectomy a safe, cost effective
Day Surgery Procedure. Arch Surg 1999;134:308-9.
Thomas S, Singh J, Bishnoi PK, Kumar A. Feasibility of day
care open cholecystectomy, evaluation in an inpatient model.
ANZ J Surg 2001;71:93-7.
Merril JR. Minimamal trauma cholecystectomy (a no touch
procedure in a well) Am J Surg 1998;54:256-7.
Oslen DO. Minilap cholecystectomy Am J Surg
;165:440-3.
Al-Tameem MM. Mini-lap cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg
Edin 1993;38:154-7.
McMohan AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, Ross S, Anderson JR,
Morran CG, et al. Laparoscopic versus minicholecystectomy,
a randomized trial. Lancet 1994;343:135-8.
Tangjareon S, Watanapa P. Minicholecystectomy under local
anaesthesia. Asian J Surg 2007;30:235-8.
Schmitz R, Rohde V, Treckmann J, Shah S. Randomized
clinical trial of conventional cholecystectomy versus mini
cholecystectomy Br J Surg 1997;84:1683-6
Majeed AW, Troy G, Nicholl JP, Smythe A, Reed MW,
Stoddard CJ, et al. Randomized, prospective, single-blind
comparison of laparoscopic versus small incision
cholecystectomy. Lancet 1996;347:989-94.
Ahmad QJ, Gulfam MA, Noorani SM, Khan NF. Ten years
experience on mini-cholecystectomy versus ten years
experience of conventional cholecystectomy at K.V.S.S. site
hospital, Karachi. Pak J Surg 2004;20:8-10.
Khan N, Haleem A, Ahmed I, Jan A. Cholecystectomy
through minilaparotomy incision, Gomal J Med Sci
;7:92-5.
Amir M, Haider R. Mini-open chlecystectomy in the
management of cholelithiasis .J Coll Physicians Surg Pak
;17:269-71.
Bhutta A, Ahmad F, Khan S, Haq A. Mini cholecystectomy:
an alternative procedure for cholelithiasis. Pak Post grad Med
J 2001;12(3):85-90.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
