FREQUENCY AND PREVENTION OF LAPAROSCOPIC PORT SITE INFECTION

Authors

  • Muhammad Naeem Taj
  • Yasmeen Iqbal
  • Zakia Akbar

Abstract

Background: The present study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness and safety of the nonpowder surgical glove for extraction of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods:
The study was carried out in Capital Hospital Islamabad and in a private hospital. The duration of
study was from March 2009 to March 2012. This was an observational study carried out in 492
patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the surgical glove for extraction of the
gallbladder and compared with the conventional method of gall bladder removal in two hospitals
were analyzed. The operative findings, port site infection and co morbid conditions were evaluated.
Results: Postoperative wound infection was found in 27 (5.48%) of 492 cases. Umbilical port
infection was found in 26 (5.28%) of cases in which gall bladder was removed without endogloves
and only one case (0.2%) had infection when gall bladder was removed with the endogloves. Wound
infection was more in acute cholecystitis (25.9%) and empyema of Gall Bladder (44.4%). Among
the co morbid conditions, diabetes mellitus has got higher frequency of wound infection (44%).
Conclusion: The use of the surgical glove for extraction of the gallbladder is safe, cheap, simple and
potentially reduces significant morbidity. Its routine use at laparoscopic cholecystectomy is
mandatory in all cases.
Keyword: laparoscopic cholecystectomy; non-powder surgical gloves; retrieval bag; wound infection

References

McSherry CK. Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg

;158:174-8.

Brockmann JG, Kocher T, Senninger NJ, Schurmann GM.

Complications due to gall stones lost during Laparosocpic

Cholecystectomy:An analysis of incidence,clinical course and

management. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1226-32

Sathesh Kumar T, Saklani AP, Vinayagam R, Blackett RL.

Spilled gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy:a review

of literature. Postgard Med J 2004;80:77-9.

Iqbal MZ. Incidence of postsurgical infections in orthopaedics

(disseratation) Karachi: College of Physicians and Surgeons of

Pakistan; 1997.

Targarona EM, Balague C, Knook MM, Trias M. Laparoscopic

surgery and surgical infections. Br J Surg 2000;87:536-44.

Russell RCG, Williams NS, Bulstrode CJK (Eds). Wound

infections. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery, 24th ed.

London: Arnold; 2004. p. 129

Muhe E. Die erste colecystektomie durch das lparoskop.

Langenbecks Arch Klin Chir 1986;369:804.

Hackan DJ, Rotstein OD. Host response to laparoscopic surgery:

mechanisms and clinical correlates. Can J Surg 1998;41:103-11.

Mir IS, Ahmad M, Ahad B. Establishing pneumoperitoneum

safely for laparoscopic surgeries. JK-Practitioner

;12(4):224-6.

Läuffer JM, Krahenbuhl L, Baer HU, Mettler M, Buchler MW.

Clinical manifestations of lost gallstones after laparoscopic

cholecystectomy: a case report with review of the literature.

Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997;7:103-12.

Raj PK. Katris F. Linderman CG. Remine SG. An inexpensive

Laparoscopic Specimen Retreival Bag. Surg Endose 1998;12:83

Downloads

Published

2012-12-01

How to Cite

Taj, M. N., Iqbal, Y., & Akbar, Z. (2012). FREQUENCY AND PREVENTION OF LAPAROSCOPIC PORT SITE INFECTION. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 24(3-4), 197–199. Retrieved from https://demo.ayubmed.edu.pk/jamc/index.php/jamc/article/view/2091