USE OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT AS AN EDUCATIONAL TOOL
Abstract
Background: Though formative assessments are popular in medical education, but data to establishtheir educational benefits are lacking. This study was conducted to determine whether participation andperformance of MBBS students in regular formative assessments are associated with positive outcomesand has measurable effects on learning. Methods: One hundred and fifty MBBS students of semester IIattending Biochemistry classes were studied by dividing into two groups till the completion of a topic.End-of-topic summative assessment marks were analysed with respect to the effect of participation andperformance in formative assessments. Results: Participation in formative assessments had astatistically significant positive relationship with summative assessment marks. Mean difference informative and summative assessment marks for group that participated in formative assessments is 1.6(95% CI=0.9–2.4, p<0.001). The mean difference in summative assessment marks for two groups is 3.4(95% CI=2.3–4.6, p<0.001). The mean difference in marks obtained by solving case studies given inSummative Assessment for two groups is 1.2 (95% CI=0.7–1.6, p<0.001). Conclusions: Formativeassessment not only assesses students’ achievements but it also enables students to recognise the areasin which they are having difficulty and to concentrate their future efforts on those areas. Adequatefrequency of formative assessment with immediate feedback is beneficial as it stimulates meaningfuland multifaceted learning. The results of this study encourage the use of formative assessment as aneducational tool in all MBBS subjects for they have significant positive effects on learning.Keywords: Formative assessment, Summative assessment, Performance, FeedbackReferences
Gronlund NE. Assessment of student achievement, 7th ed.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2003.
Black P, Wiliam D. Assessment and classroom learning.
Assessment Educ 1998;5(1):7–74.
Burge SM, Lancaster T. Assessment in undergraduate
dermatology. Clin Exp Dermatol 2004;29:441–6.
Gipps CV. What is the role for ICT-based assessment in
universities? Stud High Educ 2005;30(2):171–80.
Hill DA, Guinea AI, McCarthy WH. Formative assessment: a
student perspective. Med Educ 1994;28:394–9.
Chur-Hansen A. Medical students’ essay-writing skills: criteriabased self and tutor-evaluation and the role of language
background. Med Educ 2000;34(3):194–8.
Henly D. Use of web-based formative assessment to support
student learning. Eur J Dent Educ 2003;7:116–22.
Ker J, Mole L, Bradley P. Early introduction to inter-professional
learning: a simulated ward environment. Med Educ
;37:248–55.
Wojtczak A. Glossary of medical education terms: Part 1. Med
Teach 2002;24:216–9.
Gibbs G, Simpson C. Conditions under which assessment
supports students’ learning. Learn Teach High Educ 2004;1:3–31.
Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Guide to the
institutional self-study. Washington DC: Association of
American Medical Colleges; 2002.
Rushton A. Formative assessment: A key to deep learning? Med
Teach 2005;27:509–13.
Wass V, Van der Vluten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of
clinical competence. Lancet 2001;357:945–9.
McDaniel MA, Roediger HL 3rd, McDermott KB.
Generalizing test enhanced learning from the laboratory to the
classroom. Psychon Bull Rev 2007;14(2):200–6.
Rolfe I, McPherson J. Formative assessment: How am I doing?
Lancet 1995;345:837–9.
Goldie J. AMEE Education Guide No. 29: Evaluating
educational programmes. Med Teach 2006;28(3):210–24.
Shumway JM, Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 25: The
Assessment of outcomes for the competent sand reflective
physician. Med Teach 2003;25(6):569–84.
Burch VC, Seggie JL, Gary NE. Formative assessment promotes
learning in undergraduate clinical clerkships. S Afr Med J
;96:430–3.
Asaduzaman AKM. Practice of formative assessment in 2nd
Professional MBBS subjects: opinion of 4th Year Medical
Students. Mohakhali, Dhaka: Centre for Medical Education; 2008.
Schuwirth LW, Verheggen MM, Vander-Vleuten CP, Boshuizen
HP, Dinant GJ. Do short cases elicit different thinking processes
than factual knowledge questions do? Med Educ 2001;35:348–56.
Velan GM, Jones P, McNeil HP, Kumar RK. Integrated online
formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical
students: benefits for learning. BMC Med Educ 2008;8:52.
Carrillo-de-la-Peña MT, Baillès E, Caseras X, Martínez
A, Ortet G, Pérez J. Formative assessment and academic
achievement in pre-graduate students of health sciences. Adv
Health Sci Educ Theory Prac 2009;14(1):61–7.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.
USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.
