MODES OF DELIVERY IN SECOND PREGNANCY IN WOMEN WHO HAD ELECTIVE CAESAREAN SECTION FOR BREECH PRESENTATION IN FIRST PREGNANCY

Authors

  • Rabail Azeem Women and Children Hospital. Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Shabana Kokeb Women and Children Hospital. Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Kausar Inayat Women and Children Hospital. Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Nargis Danish Women Medical College Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Talat Nelofer Women Medical and Dental College Abbottabad-Pakistan
  • Sadaf Saifullah Women and Children Hospital. Abbottabad-Pakistan

Keywords:

Breech presentation, Caesarean section, Subsequent pregnancy, Modes of deliver.

Abstract

Background: The optimal management of breech presentation remains a debate among obstetricians worldwide. The Term Breech Trial (2000) highlighted elective caesarean section as a preferable method over vaginal delivery for breech presentations. This study investigates delivery modes in women who had an elective caesarean section for breech presentation in their first pregnancy. Objective was to evaluate delivery outcomes in the second pregnancy of women who had an elective caesarean section for breech presentation in their first pregnancy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at Jinnah International Hospital Abbottabad from October 10, 2018, to April 10, 2019. Data was collected from 321 women who had an elective caesarean section for breech presentation during their first pregnancy. The study used per-abdominal examination and obstetrical ultrasound to assess foetal presentation and recorded the mode of delivery in the second pregnancy. Results: Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 49 years, with a mean age of 28.87±4.07 years. The average interval between deliveries was 1.92±0.92 years, labour duration averaged 5.56±2.41 hours, and foetal head engagement averaged 2.92±1.35. Of the participants, 18.7% achieved a vaginal delivery, while 81.3% had a repeat caesarean section. Reasons for repeat caesarean included recurrent breech presentation in 44.9% and foetal distress in 32.4%. Conclusion: Approximately 18.7% of women who had an elective caesarean section for breech presentation in their first pregnancy achieved vaginal delivery in their second pregnancy, whereas the majority underwent another elective caesarean section.

References

Budania S, Beniwal MK, Choudhary G. A study of labour outcome m breech delivery. Adv Hum Biol 2017;7:32-6.

Mere TD, Handiso TB, Mekiso AB, Jifar MS, Ibrahim SA, Bilato DT. Prevalence and perinatal outcome of singleton term breech delivery in Wolisso hospital, Oromia Region, Southern Ethiopia: a cross sectional study. J Environ Public Health 2017;2017:9413717.

Khaskheli MN, Baloch S, Sheeba A. Elective caesarean section for breech presentation in first pregnancy and subsequent mode of labour. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2014;24(5):323-6.

Kok N, Ruiter L, Hof M, Ravelli A, Mol BW, Pajkrt E, et al. Risk of maternal and neonatal complications in subsequent pregnancy after planned caesarean section in a first birth, compared with emergency caesarean section: a nationwide comparative cohort study. BJOG 2014;121:216-23.

Dohbit JS, Foumane P, Tochie JN, Mamoudou F, Temgoua MN, Tankeu R, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of vaginal breech delivery for singleton terms pregnancies in a carefully selected Cameroonian population: a cohort study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017198.

Vistad I, Cvancarova M, Rustad BL, Henriksen T. Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:153.

Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, Denman MA, Marshall N, Fu RR, et al.

Vaginal birth after caesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2010(191):1-397

Bue and Lauszus 2016, Moxibustion did not have an effect in a randomised clinical trial for version of breech position. Danish Medical Journal 63(2), A599

Coulon et.al. 2014, Version of breech fetuses by moxibustion with acupuncture. Obstetrics and Gynecology 124(1), 32-39. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000303

Coyle ME, Smith CA, Peat B 2012, Cephalic version by moxibustion for breech presentation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD003928. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003928.pub3

Published

2024-09-08

Most read articles by the same author(s)