THE SHAPE AND SIZE OF SELLA TURCICA IN SKELETAL CLASS I, II, AND III MALOCCLUSIONS

Authors

  • Gulalai Jan Department of Orthodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Shahab Adil Department of Orthodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Kainat Zeb Department of Orthodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Omaima Alam Department of Orthodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Ghazala Wazir Department of Orthodontics, Peshawar Dental College, Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan
  • Wahid Ullah Faculty of Rehabilitation and Allied Health Sciences (FRAHS), Riphah International University, Islamabad-Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-13478

Keywords:

Sella turcica; Size of Sella; Shape of Sella; Lateral cephalogram; Malocclusions

Abstract

Background: The Sella point, located near the center of the Sella Turcica and providing cover for the pituitary gland in the skull, is one of the most frequently used cranial cephalometric landmarks for radiograph tracing. The research aimed to quantify the dimensions and delineate the anatomy of the sella turcica across various skeletal shapes. Methods: 180 subjects, aged 9 to 27 years, including 91 men and 89 females, had lateral cephalometric radiographs. These subjects were divided into three skeleton classes: Class I, II, and III, with 60 subjects in each group. Measurements of the length, depth, and anteroposterior diameter were made, and the shape was examined using linear dimensions. The difference in linear dimensions was determined using a student t-test, and the link between sella turcica size and skeletal types was examined using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). When comparing the age groups, the older group's linear dimensions were bigger than the younger group's (p < 0.01). Male and female length differences were found to be significantly different (p <0.05). The length and diameter of the skeletons differed significantly from the sella size when compared. Sixty-one percent of the individuals had normal-appearing sella turcica. Further research addressing the sella turcica in the South Indian population can use the current study's linear dimensions and form as reference standards.

References

Sinha, S., A. Shetty, and K. Nayak, The morphology of Sella Turcica in individuals with different skeletal malocclusions-A cephalometric study. Translational Research in Anatomy, 2020. 18: p. 100054.

Akay, G., et al., Three-dimensional assessment of the sella turcica: comparison between cleft lip and palate patients and skeletal malocclusion classes. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2020. 42: p. 977-983.

Mortezai, O., et al., Relationship of the Morphology and Size of Sella Turcica with Dental Anomalies and Skeletal Malocclusions. Diagnostics, 2023. 13(19): p. 3088.

Chou, S.-T., et al., Morphology of sella turcica and bridging prevalence correlated with sex and craniofacial skeletal pattern in Eastern Asia population: CBCT study. BioMed Research International, 2021. 2021.

Tepedino, M., et al., Morphometric analysis of sella turcica in growing patients: an observational study on shape and dimensions in different sagittal craniofacial patterns. Scientific Reports, 2019. 9(1): p. 19309.

Kumar, A., et al., Assessment of size and morphology of sella turcica in different skeletal pattern-A cephalometric study. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research, 2020. 8(2): p. 111-114.

Afzal, E. and M. Fida, Association between variations in sella turcica dimensions and morphology and skeletal malocclusions. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad, 2019. 31(2): p. 172.

Silveira, B.T., et al., Assessment of the relationship between size, shape and volume of the sella turcica in class II and III patients prior to orthognathic surgery. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 2020. 42: p. 577-582.

Gökçe, G. and M.A. Yavan, Morphometric Assessment of the Sella Turcica in different morphologic types of class II malocclusion: a retrospective study. Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2022. 13(1): p. 112-118.

Silverman, F.N., Roentgen standards for size of the pituitary fossa from infancy through adolescence. Am J Roentgenol, 1957. 78: p. 451-460.

Martinez Florez, D., D. Rinchuse, and T. Zullo, Influence of maxillary lateral incisor width ratio on perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2021. 33(3): p. 510-515.

Rodríguez-López, S., et al., Analysis of the esthetic preferences of Spanish laypersons and dentists regarding the different width proportions of the maxillary anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2023. 129(5): p. 778-786.

Bendahmash, M., F. Dhafr, and A. Awwad, Evaluation of Saudi population perception of the proportion of maxillary anterior teeth width ratio to the dental papilla position. EC Dental Science, 2020. 19: p. 01-06.

Al Taki, A. and E. Abuhijleh, Effect of Canine Dimensions on Smile Aesthetics among General Dentists, Dental Students and Laypersons. The Open Dentistry Journal, 2020. 14(1).

Dag, O.D., I. Dagli, and A. Kurt, The influence of different tooth proportions obtained using digital smile design on the perception of smile esthetics. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, 2024. 36(3): p. 494-502.

Kalia, R., An analysis of the aesthetic proportions of anterior maxillary teeth in a UK population. British Dental Journal, 2020. 228(6): p. 449-455.

Jouhar, R., et al., Smile aesthetics in Pakistani population: dentist preferences and perceptions of anterior teeth proportion and harmony. BMC Oral Health, 2024. 24(1): p. 401.

Shah, R. and R. Nair, Comparative evaluation of facial attractiveness by laypersons in terms of facial proportions and equate it's deviation from divine proportions-A photographic study. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 2022. 12(5): p. 492-499.

Akl, M.A., et al., Mathematical tooth proportions: a systematic review. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2022. 31(4): p. 289-298.

Kolte, A., R. Kolte, and R.K. Swami, Evaluation of the effect of tooth size on smile attractiveness from the perspective of art students, dental students, and laypeople in Sanandaj, Iran, 2017. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 2020. 15(2).

Ahmed, N., The analysis of orofacial esthetic proportions with natural maxillary anterior teeth and perception of smile attractiveness in pakistani citizens: a 2d photographic and 3d digital dental models study. 2022.

Honorato, J.M., Association of gold proportion of maxillary anterior teeth and dental beauty self-perception of orthodontic patients. Dental Press Publishing-J Clin Dent Res.[Internet], 2020. 17(1): p. 82-91.

Paken, G. and M. Ãœnal, Evaluation of perceptions of smile esthetics by dental students. Balkan Journal of Dental Medicine, 2021. 25(2): p. 100-107.

Agou, S.H., et al., Dimensions of maxillary lateral incisor on the esthetic perception of smile: A comparative study of dental professionals and the general population. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2020. 21(9): p. 992-6.

Tariq, K., et al., ANALYSIS OF GOLDEN PROPORTION IN MAXILLARY ANTERIOR DENTITION. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 2022. 42(2): p. 100-103.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-08

How to Cite

Gulalai Jan, Shahab Adil, Kainat Zeb, Omaima Alam, Ghazala Wazir, & Ullah, W. (2024). THE SHAPE AND SIZE OF SELLA TURCICA IN SKELETAL CLASS I, II, AND III MALOCCLUSIONS. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 36(3), 647–653. https://doi.org/10.55519/JAMC-03-13478

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.