IMMEDIATE AND MIDTERM RESULTS OF BALLOON AORTIC VALVULOPLASTY IN CHILDREN WITH AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DYSPLASTIC AORTIC VALVE

Authors

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to determine the immediate and midterm outcome of balloon aortic valvuloplasty in children from age 1 month to 16 years, with special reference to mean balloon to aortic valve ratio along with dooming versus dysplastic valve. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty in a single tertiary care hospital were reviewed regarding immediate outcome, morphology of aortic valve, mean balloon to aortic valve ratio and complications during procedure from January 2006 till December 2016. Results: Of 171 patients, 80.11% had fall to good results while 73.1% had adequate outcome. Mean gradient fall of more than 50% or Peak systolic gradient decreased significantly post ballooning, which indicates good results. The age ranges from 1–92 months, 89.4% patients from age group less than1 year had adequate outcome, (p=0.017). In terms of morphology, 55.6% cases had doming while 44.4% cases had dysplastic aortic valve. There was no significant difference between dysplastic and doming valves in terms of outcome (p=0.224). Only 6 patients (3.5%) developed significant aortic regurgitation. Regarding short-term and intermediate outcome 92% of the patient were free from a second intervention and there was no significant difference between complications regarding balloon to aortic valve ratio also. Conclusion: Our 10-year experience showed that balloon aortic valvuloplasty is a safe and effective therapy, irrespective of age groups. The complications rate is low and good outcome is achieved by keeping balloon to aortic valve ratio of ±0.9 irrespective of morphology of valve.Keywords: Children; Congenital aortic valve stenosis; Balloon aortic valvuloplasty

Author Biographies

Haseen Dil Wazir

fellow pediatric cardiologychildren hospital lahore

Ahmad Usaid Qureshi

Assitant professor pediatric cardiologychildren hospital lahore

Syed Najam Hyder

associate professorchildren hospital lahore

Masood Sadiq

professor of pediatric cardiologychildren hospital lahore

References

Maskatia SA, Justino H, Ing FF, Crystal MA, Mattamal RJ, Petit CJ. Aortic valve morphology is associated with outcomes following balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013;81(1):90–5.

Gao K, Sachdeva R, Goldstein BH, Lang S, Petit CJ. Aortic Valve Morphology Correlates with Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Outcome in Children with Congenital Aortic Stenosis Prior to Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty. J Invasive Cardiol 2016;28(9):381–8.

Lababidi Z. Aortic balloon valvuloplasty. Am Heart J 1983;106(4 Pt 1):751–2.

Brown DW, Dipilato AE, Chong EC, Lock JE, McElhinney DB. Aortic valve reinterventions after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis intermediate and late follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(21):1740–9.

Awasthy N, Garg R, Radhakrishnan S, Shrivastava S. Long term results of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty of congenital aortic stenosis in adolescents and young adults. Indian Heart J 2016;68(5):604–11.

Prijic SM, Vukomanovic VA, Stajevic MS, Bjelakovic BB, Zdravkovic MD, Sehic IN, et al. Balloon dilation and surgical valvotomy comparison in non-critical congenital aortic valve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 2015;36(3):616–24.

Gatzoulis MA, Rigby ML, Shinebourne EA, Redington AN. Contemporary results of balloon valvuloplasty and surgical valvotomy for congenital aortic stenosis. Arch Dis Child 1995;73(1):66–9.

Parezanović V, Djukić M, Daehnert I, Gligić A, Stefanović I, Jovanović I, et al. Balloon valvuloplasty as a treatment of congenital aortic stenosis in children and adolescents. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2014;142(1-2):17–22.

Brown JW, Ruzmetov M, Vijay P, Rodefeld, Turrentine MW. Surgery for aortic stenosis in children: a 40-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76(5):1398–411.

Hyder SN, Kazmi U, Khan A, Sheikh AM, Sadiq M. Critical Neonatal Aortic Valve Stenosis, Immediate and Intermediate Outcome of Percutaneous Balloon Valvuloplasty. Pak Pediatr J 2013;37(2):106–11.

Beekman RH, Rocchini AP, Gilon JH, Mancini GB. Hemodynamic determinants of the peak systolic left ventricular-aortic pressure gradient in children with valvar aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1992;69(8):813–5.

Lima VC, Zahn E, Houde C, Smallhorn J, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Non-invasive determination of the systolic peak-to-peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model. Cardiol Young 2000;10(2):115–9.

Sholler GF, Keane JF, Perry SB, Sanders SP, Lock JE. Balloon Dilation of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis Results and Influence of Technical and Morphological Features on Outcome. Circulation 1988;78(2):351–60.

Tribouilloy C, Avine´e P, Feng SW, Rey JL, Slama M, Lesbre JP. End diastolic flow velocity just beneath the aortic isthmus assessed by pulsed Doppler echocardiography: a new predictor of the aortic regurgitant fraction. Br Heart J 1991;65(1):37–40.

Snider AR. Quantification of aortic regurgitation. In: Snider AR, ed. Echocardiography in pediatric heart disease. St Louis: Mosby, 1997; p.180–6.

Porras D, Brown DW, Rathod R, Friedman K, Gauvreau K, Lock JE, et al. Acute Outcomes after Introduction of a Standardized Clinical Assessment and Management Plan (SCAMP) for Balloon Aortic Valvuloplastyin Congenital Aortic Stenosis. Congenit Heart Dis 2014;9(4):316–25.

Jijeh AMZ, Ismail M, Al-Bahanta A, Alomrani A, Tamimi O. Percutaneous balloon dilatation for congenital aortic stenosis during infancy: A 15-year single-center experience. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 2018;11(2):143–7.

McCrindle BW, Blackstone EH, Williams WG, Sittiwangkul R, Spray TL, Azakie A, et al. Are outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter balloon valvotomy equivalent in neonatal critical aortic stenosis? Circulation 2001;104(12 Suppl 1):I152–8.

Tomita H, Echigo S, Kimura K, Kobayashi T, Bakanishi T, Ishizawa R, et al. Balloon Aortic Valvuloplasty in Children A Multicenter Study in Japan. Jpn Circ J 2001;65(7):599–602.

Corzani A, Donti A, Gesuete V, Formigari R, Testa G, Bronzetti G, et al. Percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty in congenital aortic valve stenosis performed in patients older than one month: a good alternative to surgery. G Ital Cardiol (Rome) 2010;11(9):674–9.

Soulatges C, Momeni M, Zarrouk N, Moniotte S, Carbonez K, Barrea C, et al. Long-Term Results of Balloon Valvuloplasty as Primary Treatment for Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis: a 20-Year Review. Pediatr Cardiol 2015;36(6):1145–52.

Balmer C, Beghetti M, Fasnacht M, Friedli B, Arbenz U. Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common. Heart 2004;90(1):77–81.

Pedra CA, Pedra SR, Braga SL, Esteves CA, Moreira SM, dos Santos MA, et al. Short- and Midterm Follow-up Results of Valvuloplasty with Balloon Catheter for Congenital Aortic Stenosis. Arq Bras Cardiol 2003;81(2):120–8.

Torres A, Vincent JA, Everett A, Lim S, Forester SR, Marshall AC, et al. Balloon valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis: Multi-center safety and efficacy outcome assessment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;86(5):808–20.

Moore P, Egito E, Mowrey H, Perry SB, Lock JE, Keane JF. Midterm Results of Balloon Dilation of Congenital Aortic Stenosis: Predictors of Success. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27(5):1257–63.

Pedra CA, Sidhu R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen DG, Justo RN, Freedom RM, et al. Outcomes after balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis in children and adolescents. Cardiol Young 2004;14(3):315–21.

Gundry SR, Bahrendt DM. Prognostic factors in valvotomy for critical aortic stenosis in infancy. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1986;92(4):747–54.

Ewert P, Bertram H, Breuer J, Dahnert I, Dittrich S, Eicken A, et al. Balloon valvuloplasty in the treatment of congenital aortic valve stenosis – a retrospective multicenter survey of more than 1000 patients. Int J Card 2011;149(5):182–5.

Philipps RR, Gerlis LM, Wilson N, Walker DR. Aortic valve damage caused by operative balloon dilatation of critical aortic valve stenosis. Br Heart J 1987;57(2):168–70.

McCrindle BW. Independent predictors of immediate results of percutaneous balloon aortic valvotomy in childhood. Vallvuloplasty and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies (VACA) Registry Investigators. Am J Cardiol 1996;77(4):286–93.

Choy M, Beekman RH, Rocchini AP, Crowley DC, Snider AR, Dick M 2nd, et al. Percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty for valvar aortic stenosis in infants and children. Am J Cardiol 1987;59(9):1010–3.

Holzer RJ, Cheatham JP. Shifting the balance between aortic insufficiency and residual gradients after balloon aortic valvuloplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56(21):1750–1.

De Giovanni JV, Edgar RA, Cranston A. Adenosine induced transient cardiac standstill in catheter interventional procedures for congenital heart disease. Heart 1998;80(4):330–3.

Daehnert I, Rotzsch C, Wiener M, Schneider P. Rapid right ventricular pacing is an alternative to adenosine in catheter interventional procedures for congenital heart disease. Heart 2004;90(9):1047–50.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-06

Issue

Vol. 31 No. 4 (2019): JOURNAL OF AYUB MEDICAL COLLEGE, ABBOTTABAD

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

License

Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad is an OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL which means that all content is FREELY available without charge to all users whether registered with the journal or not. The work published by J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad is licensed and distributed under the creative commons License  CC BY ND Attribution-NoDerivs. Material printed in this journal is OPEN to access, and are FREE for use in academic and research work with proper citation. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad accepts only original material for publication with the understanding that except for abstracts, no part of the data has been published or will be submitted for publication elsewhere before appearing in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. The Editorial Board of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and authenticity of material printed in J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. However, conclusions and statements expressed are views of the authors and do not reflect the opinion/policy of J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad or the Editorial Board.

USERS are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.

AUTHORS retain the rights of free downloading/unlimited e-print of full text and sharing/disseminating the article without any restriction, by any means including twitter, scholarly collaboration networks such as ResearchGate, Academia.eu, and social media sites such as Twitter, LinkedIn, Google Scholar and any other professional or academic networking site.

Most read articles by the same author(s)